Group29.com - What did you expect?
  Create an account
:: Home  ::  Downloads  ::  Your Account  ::  Forums  ::
Google Adsense
Modules
  • Home
  • Downloads
  • ExpectationReviews
  • Forums
  • Group29 FAQ
  • MovieReviews
  • OtherReviews
  • Stories Archive
  • Submit News
  • Top 10
  • Topics
  • Web Links
  • New at Group29
    ·Movie Review: Buzz Lightyear Movie [10]
    ·Movie Review: The Marvels [7]
    ·UCLA vs. USC 2022 preview
    ·Expectation Review: Black Adam [22]
    ·Tuna Is Not The Favorite Pizza Topping in Minnesota
    ·Expectation Review: Captain Marvel [25]
    ·Forum Topic: Update your Facebook property
    ·Web Link: WEP Key Converter
    ·Forum Topic: Why does my IPA file get saved as a zip file in IE?
    ·Web Link: BeyondCompare

    read more...
    TheForce.Net
    ·Rebelscum Breast Cancer Awareness Charity Patch
    ·BBC Interviews J.J. Abrams About Trek And Wars
    ·CEII: Jabba's Palace Reunion - Massive Guest Announcements
    ·Fathead's May the Fourth Be With You!
    ·Star Wars Night With The Tampa Bay Storm Reminder
    ·Stephen Hayford Star Wars Weekends Exclusive Art
    ·ForceCast #251: To Spoil or Not to Spoil
    ·New Timothy Zahn Audio Books Coming
    ·SDCC: Exclusive Black Series Boba Fett With Han In Carbonite Set
    ·Star Wars Art Exposition May 4th

    read more...
    Hot trends
    ·Group29.com

    read more...
    Group29 Discussion Board :: View topic - Greatest Slashdot post...ever
    Log in Register Forum FAQ Memberlist Search
    Ratings, Links, Free Speech and more

    Group29 Discussion Board Forum Index -> Group29 General -> Greatest Slashdot post...ever
    Post new topic  Reply to topic View previous topic :: View next topic 
    Greatest Slashdot post...ever
    PostPosted: Sun Sep 19, 2004 2:23 pm Reply with quote
    BB
    Regular
     
    Joined: Jun 23, 2004
    Posts: 340


      


    http://apple.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=44091&cid=4592270

    Doug,

    If you weren't aware of it before, you probably know it by now. Anything interesting or useful that rears its head on Slashdot will likely be ripped to shreds by what has quickly become the nets most vicious and petty peanut gallery.

    Slashdottians know nothing, they accomplish nothing, and their opinions are worth nothing. They are uniformly bitter, small-minded geeks who overestimate their own importance and their own skillz. They are, for the most part, losers. Their biggest accomplishment is in insulting others' spelling and grammar, attacking the GPL license despite their grade level understanding of it, and tricking people into clicking on goatse.cx links. They are know-it-all blowhards who use their computers primarily for Pornography and online gaming, at which they cheat regularly to offset their complete lack of motor skills.

    Despite touting the wonderous greatness of linux and open source, they all use Windows and Internet Explorer. They like Macs because of OSX, but want it to run on X86 so they can steal a copy and give nothing back. They will eventually buy a Mac due to their inability to run Windows without crashing it constantly by their own stupidity, and become raving unbalanced lunatics who do more harm than good for the Mac community by claiming that the G4 is quadruple the speed of a dual 3Ghz Xeon box.

    They lie about their own experience to make their case, and when you win an argument with them, they post anonymously in order to tell you they've had sex with your mother.

    Don't become a regular here, you will become retarded.

    Signed,
    Yoda the Retard
    View user's profile Visit poster's website
    Obligatory Spam Solution Rejection Form
    PostPosted: Tue Jan 18, 2005 8:31 pm Reply with quote
    BB
    Regular
     
    Joined: Jun 23, 2004
    Posts: 340


      


    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=101446&cid=8645897

    I have never seen this since, but I happened to catch it when it was posted. Nice Job T(om) Copeland!
    ------

    This article advocates a

    (x) technical ( ) legislative ( ) market-based ( ) vigilante

    approach to fighting spam. Your idea will not work. Here is why it won't work.
    (One or more of the following may apply to your particular idea, and it may
    have other flaws which used to vary from state to state before a bad federal
    law was passed.)

    ( ) Spammers can easily use it to harvest email addresses
    ( ) Mailing lists and other legitimate email uses would be affected
    ( ) No one will be able to find the guy or collect the money
    ( ) It is defenseless against brute force attacks
    ( ) It will stop spam for two weeks and then we'll be stuck with it
    ( ) Users of email will not put up with it
    ( ) Microsoft will not put up with it
    ( ) The police will not put up with it
    ( ) Requires too much cooperation from spammers
    (x) Requires immediate total cooperation from everybody at once
    (x) Many email users cannot afford to lose business or alienate potential
    employers
    ( ) Spammers don't care about invalid addresses in their lists
    ( ) Anyone could anonymously destroy anyone else's career or business

    Specifically, your plan fails to account for

    ( ) Laws expressly prohibiting it
    (x) Lack of centrally controlling authority for email
    ( ) Open relays in foreign countries
    ( ) Ease of searching tiny alphanumeric address space of all email addresses
    ( ) Asshats
    ( ) Jurisdictional problems
    ( ) Unpopularity of weird new taxes
    ( ) Public reluctance to accept weird new forms of money
    ( ) Huge existing software investment in SMTP
    ( ) Susceptibility of protocols other than SMTP to attack
    ( ) Willingness of users to install OS patches received by email
    ( ) Armies of worm riddled broadband-connected Windows boxes
    ( ) Eternal arms race involved in all filtering approaches
    ( ) Extreme profitability of spam
    (x) Joe jobs and/or identity theft
    ( ) Technically illiterate politicians
    ( ) Extreme stupidity on the part of people who do business with spammers
    (x) Dishonesty on the part of spammers themselves
    ( ) Bandwidth costs that are unaffected by client filtering
    ( ) Outlook

    and the following philosophical objections may also apply:

    ( ) Ideas similar to yours are easy to come up with, yet none have ever been
    shown practical
    ( ) Any scheme based on opt-out is unacceptable
    (x) SMTP headers should not be the subject of legislation
    ( ) Blacklists suck
    (x) Whitelists suck
    ( ) We should be able to talk about Viagra without being censored
    ( ) Countermeasures should not involve wire fraud or credit card fraud
    ( ) Countermeasures should not involve sabotage of public networks
    ( ) Countermeasures must work if phased in gradually
    ( ) Sending email should be free
    ( ) Why should we have to trust you and your servers?
    ( ) Incompatiblity with open source or open source licenses
    ( ) Feel-good measures do nothing to solve the problem
    ( ) Temporary/one-time email addresses are cumbersome
    ( ) I don't want the government reading my email
    ( ) Killing them that way is not slow and painful enough

    Furthermore, this is what I think about you:

    (x) Sorry dude, but I don't think it would work.
    ( ) This is a stupid idea, and you're a stupid person for suggesting it.
    View user's profile Visit poster's website
    Greatest Slashdot post...ever
      Group29 Discussion Board Forum Index -> Group29 General
    You cannot post new topics in this forum
    You cannot reply to topics in this forum
    You cannot edit your posts in this forum
    You cannot delete your posts in this forum
    You cannot vote in polls in this forum
    All times are GMT - 6 Hours  
    Page 1 of 1  

      
      
     Post new topic  Reply to topic  


    Powered by phpBB © 2001-2003 phpBB Group
    Theme created by Vjacheslav Trushkin
    Forums ©
    Group29 Productions

    All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest (c) 2006 by Group29 Productions.


    You can syndicate Group29 Productions news with an RSS Feeder using the file backend.php


    PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.
    Page Generation: 0.19 Seconds

    :: HeliusGray phpbb2 style by CyberAlien :: PHP-Nuke theme by www.nukemods.com ::